The Crucible of Longing
Desire, Divine Eros, and the Alchemy of Absence in Incarnational Mysticism
There is a wound in us that will not close. It is older than memory, deeper than bone. A fissure in the soul where the wind of God blows through, whispering of a home we have never seen but cannot forget. We spend our lives pressing against it, through skin, through sacrament, through the fragile bridges we build between bodies. We mistake it for hunger, for lust, for loneliness. But it is none of these things. Or rather, it is all of them, distilled into a single, unbearable truth: we are made for more.
This is a key tenet of incarnational mysticism: that the sacred does not flee from our hunger but inhabits it. That the Divine is not appalled by our trembling hands but fashioned them. That the very ache we try to numb, to outrun, to cauterize with piety or pleasure, is the imprint of a love so vast it had to become flesh to be endured.
Every man is born with a cry. Every woman with an outstretched hand. Before we know language, before we know shame, we know this: we are incomplete. The mystics often referred to it as the inconsolable longing. The poets named it desire. The saints, following a pierced Christ, recognized it as love’s wound.
It is there in the addict’s twitching fingers, in the widow’s quiet reach for a vanished form, in the monk’s midnight vigil before a silent altar. We try to fill it, with flesh, with noise, with ambition, with prayer. But the hole is shaped like God, and nothing else fits.
The Arsonist Love
The mystics speak of God as fire. Not the tame flicker of votive candles, but the wildfire that consumes forests, that licks the oxygen from the lungs and leaves the soul gasping. Teresa of Avila felt it as a seraph’s golden spear plunging into her heart, twisting with "so sweet a pain" that she could not wish it gone. John of the Cross wrote of a flame so fierce it seared the soul clean of all but longing.
This is the unbearable truth of divine eros: Love does not just come to console, it comes to consume.
And so we flee. We prefer our ache manageable, our gods at a safe distance. We cling to the shadows, terrified of what the light might reveal—that our deepest wounds are not punishments but portals, that our brokenness is not a barrier to grace but its battleground.
But Love is patient. Love is relentless. Love kneels in the dirt like a beggar, whispering to the prodigal: You are not far now. Turn around.
The Alchemy of Longing
What then do we do with this fire in the clay? This hunger that will not be satisfied?
We offer it.
Not as a sacrifice to a wrathful God, but as a sacrament to a loving one. The celibate’s loneliness, the married couple’s fragile vows, the addict’s trembling sobriety. These are not signs of failure. They are the raw material of holiness.
For desire, when lifted into the divine furnace, does not vanish. It is transfigured. The craving for a lover becomes the capacity to love beyond possession. The terror of abandonment becomes the freedom to belong to God alone. Even the most shattered heart, held up to the light, becomes a stained-glass window—broken fragments revealing a pattern too vast to see from inside the pain.
This alchemy of incarnational mysticism is not the negation of desire, but its redemption.
The mystics knew this truth, that every gasp of holy hunger is God’s hand in the dark. "You have made us for Yourself," Augustine cried, "and our hearts are restless until they rest in You." But what is this rest if not the eye of the storm, where St. John of the Cross’s "living flame of love" burns brightest, precisely where it wounds?
In one of her famous prayers from The Dialogue, St. Catherine of Siena beautifully expresses this idea: “You are a mystery as deep as the sea; the more I search, the more I find, and the more I find the more I search for You. But I can never be satisfied; what I receive will ever leave me desiring more. When You fill my soul I have an even greater hunger.”
In Surprised by Joy, C.S. Lewis called it "Joy," the inconsolable longing for something beyond this world. “Joy is distinct not only from pleasure but even from aesthetic pleasure. It must have the stab, the pang, the inconsolable longing.”
In The Pilgrim’s Regress, Lewis puts it this way: “That unnameable something, desire for which pierces us like a rapier at the smell of a bonfire, the sound of wild ducks flying overhead, the title of The Well at the World’s End, the opening lines of Kubla Khan, the morning cobwebs in late summer, or the noise of falling waves.”
The Flesh of the Resurrection
The resurrection of the body is not a metaphor. It is the promise that every scar, every wound, every tremor of desire that ever made us weep with its unbearable weight will one day be revealed as a thread in the tapestry of communion.
Until then, we walk the knife’s edge between memory and hope. We love fiercely. We grieve without despair. We let the wound remain open, not because we are masochists, but because it is a way we allow the divine breath to enter.
In the end, isn’t this what we are all aching for? To be seen, not just observed, but truly beheld. To be chosen, not for what we perform, but for who we are when the mask slips and the light is low. To be gathered into the heart of another and told, without condition or hesitation, You are mine. I will not cast you out.
And is that not salvation? Not a distant reward, but God’s thunderous, trembling yes to everything we are—flesh and frailty, fire and fear. The divine Lover who does not flinch at our scars, who does not shrink from our desires, but enters them. Fills them. Redeems them from within.
The Incarnation Continues
The Incarnation did not end in Bethlehem’s straw and blood. It did not close at the tombstone rolled back. It continues—in secret, in silence, in every soul that dares to offer its longing instead of burying it. In every trembling body that chooses reverence over shame. In every broken heart that reaches into the night not knowing if anyone will reach back, and finds, impossibly, that Christ was already there.
He is being born again. In you. In me. In the ache that refuses to leave us, even when we beg it to. And perhaps it was never meant to leave. Perhaps the ache is not the absence of God, but the echo of His nearness. Perhaps it is not emptiness at all, but the knock of heaven from the inside.
How long have each of us tried to satisfy this longing with achievement, romantic/sexual relationships, psychotherapy, sports, entertainments, political scuffling, addictions, status, consumption, etc. before we finally became aware of the God-shaped hole in our hearts? Your essays never fail to remind me what truly matters, what truly satisfies.
Your idiom here puts me in mind of Leonard Cohen's *Book of Mercy*.